Chapter 04 / 16

Framing

A frame chooses which part of a matter the audience sees, and tells them what it means.

Framing selects a few features of a situation, makes them stand out, and packages a problem, a cause, a judgment, and a fix.

Working terms

  • frame
  • salience
  • selection
  • agenda-setting
  • second-level agenda-setting
  • priming
  • episodic frame
  • thematic frame
  • problem definition
  • remedy

Studies Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw, 1972 · Robert Entman, 1993 · Shanto Iyengar, 1991

Why it works

The frame decides what the audience is even looking at

Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw showed in 1972 that news does not tell people what to think, it tells them what to think about. When editors covered an issue heavily, the public rated that issue as important. The first power is selection: put one matter forward and leave the rest in the dark, and the audience treats the one you chose as the matter that counts.

Robert Entman defined framing in 1993 as selecting some aspects of a situation and making them stand out. A full frame does four jobs at once: it defines the problem, names the cause, passes a moral judgment, and recommends a fix. Change any one of the four and the whole matter reads differently while the facts stay the same.

Shanto Iyengar separated episodic frames, which show one case or one person, from thematic frames, which show the pattern and the conditions. Episodic frames make the audience blame the individual. Thematic frames make them look at the system. You choose which, and you choose who gets blamed.

When to use it

Frame first, argue later

  • You control the first sentence or the headline. That is where the frame is set, before any evidence appears.
  • You want the audience to blame a person. Use an episodic frame built on one vivid case.
  • You want the audience to blame a system or a policy. Use a thematic frame built on the pattern and the numbers.
  • Two sides are fighting over the same facts. Win by fixing the problem definition, not by adding more facts.

How to do it

Build a frame

  1. Write the problem in one sentence, naming who is hurt and how. This is the part the audience will remember.
  2. Name the cause in the same breath. Whoever the frame names as the cause is who the audience will hold responsible.
  3. Pass the judgment plainly: wrong, unfair, dangerous, or good. Do not leave the audience to set the tone themselves.
  4. State the fix. A frame with no remedy leaves the audience stuck; a frame with one points their feeling at an action.
  5. Choose episodic or thematic. For blame on a person, show one case in close detail. For blame on a system, show the pattern and the numbers.
  6. Test by substitution: write the same event under a rival frame. If yours still holds attention against it, keep it; if not, sharpen the problem definition.

What it captures

What framing captures

A frame captures the audience’s attention before they weigh any evidence, because it sets what the evidence is about. It captures blame by naming a cause. It captures their sense of right and wrong by supplying the judgment. It captures the next step by naming the fix. The audience can accept every fact you give and still end where you want, because the frame decided what the facts meant.

Read the studies

Source path

  1. Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media (1972).Article
  2. Robert M. Entman. Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power (2007).Article
  3. David H. Weaver. Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing, and Priming (2007).Article